Saturday, July 7, 2012


We must implement E-Voting Estopp our MedicalRecords
On the Graves of Tenants in Common at 1058 Summit,
Sharons Parents, We must make Government Accountable.
Sharon is on Record to Repeal ObamaCare_Tax.
Abolish State Committment Panel chaired via Lesbian Judge.

Just substitute my signature as set forth below.  Chris Barden and I have corresponded.  He agrees on my analysis on the Medicaid features of the PP&ACA. -- J. R. G.
----- Original Message -----
From: jack graham
Sent: Saturday, July 07, 2012 10:10 AM
Subject: Re: Silver lining

Sharon Anderson, -- I wrote this note to my sister-in-law.  Thought you'd be interested. -- John Remington Graham of the Minnesota Bar (#3664X)
Kerry, -- Everybody thinks that the big suprise in the Obamacare decision was Roberts' self-contradictory opinion in which he held that the penalty for not buying insurance is not a tax, yet is a tax.  It so happens that this opinion seemed to fit better with Ginsberg, who thinks that Congress can do anything, than Scalia who knows that Congress can do only a limited number of things.  And so we have been told by irresponsible journalists that Obamacare was upheld. 
Well, I have read all four opinions, 193 pages of dense text.  I have studied, taught, practiced, and published in the field of constitutional law throughout my career.  I was one of the amicus lawyers in the Obamacare case.   I know who was trying to do what and why.  I was trying to strengthen the hand of Clarence Thomas, but I have been in contact with many other lawyers in the case.  The 26 attorneys general suing in the federal district court in northern Florida had the main objective in mind of knocking out the Medicaid extension provisions, at least the sanction upon a State which elected not to take the money, because participation means bankruptcy.  Never before in American history have States been allowed to sue in federal court to restrain federal grants-in-aid conditioned upon specified exercise of powers reserved by the 10th amendment.  The attorneys general brought suit to protest, but did not expect to win on that point.  Nobody expected them to win.  They lost on that point in the federal district court in Jacksonville, and before the 11th circuit.  The old case of Massachusetts v. Mellon, 262 U. S. 447 (1923), was clearly decisive, and I gave them no chance at all.  So the 26 attorneys general aimed mainly at the penalty for not buying insurance, and hoped to bring down the whole Act with it. Roberts, however, did not understand the use of taxes as a means of regulating commerce as stated by Alexander Hamilton in his Opinion on the Bank and his Report on Manufactures, and as was approved  in the Philadelphia Convention.  So  he screwed up.  That's too bad for him, the court, and the country.  But no matter, and here's why:
In order for Obamacare to work as intended or at all as a practical matter, we need both the penalty for not buying insurance, as an inducement to individuals, and the sanction for not accepting Medicaid extension, as an inducement to the States.  Otherwise the Act is dysfunctional.  The mainstream media intentionally covered up the most important aspect of the decision of the United States Supreme Court, which is this: not only were the 26 attorneys general allowed to sue in behalf of their respective States, contrary to Massachusetts v. Mellon, as has never previously been allowed, but they won by vote of 7-2 before the United States Supreme Court!  Roberts, two on the liberal wing, and four on the conservative wing held that the sanction on Medicaid extension in Obamacare is unconstitutional as an abuse of the spending power, which means that any State can bankruptcy by refusing the Medicaid program in Obamacare, yet suffer no penalty  This means that Obamacare cannot be implemented without amendments.  It has already been repealed in the House in which all revenue bills must originate.  Without the House, Obamacare cannot be funded. It will be repealed by the House once again over the next few months.  And 52% want Obamacare repealed, while 39% want to keep it.  This margin has been lopsided ever since the law was passed. Obamacare will, naturally, be a big issue this fall. 
Please feel free to pass this around. -- J. R. G.
P. S. Lord Monckton has just written a very advanced, and up-to-date report on Obama's birth certificate.  I can send it to you, 20 pages of concise, beautiful English. He just sticks to the facts.  He does not change the subject when challenged.  He does not use ridicule, intimidation, or guilt by association. The conclusions are inescapable to anyone who is intellctually and morally honest. You don't have to read this report.  You are also free to bury your head in the sand.  Somebody in Hawaii is surely not telling the truth.  The birth certificate is meaningful only in three ways: (1) It will swing some millions of votes away from Obama, which could be fatal in a very close election.  (2) It serves as a warning signal or red flag for those who are not asleep at the switch.  (3) As Lord Acton said, historical responsibility has to make up for want to legal responsibility.  -- J. R. G.

Receipt of Responses

Dear Sharon Anderson,

Thank you for replying to our League of Women Voters Minnesota Education Fund, with support from Target, 2012 election voter guide.  We appreciate your cooperation. Here is a copy of your submission:

Email Address
(651) 776-5835
Facebook Page
Twitter Page

HomeTown St.Paul Central Minnesota Homegrown

Retired RealEstateEntreprenuerVA Widow_Whistleblow

Why are you seeking this office?
(1) Expose Bizzare Committment's, Separate Health Care of alleged Mentally Ill, Close down St.Peter, Brainard Hospitals as ineffective, overly burdensome to the Tax Paying Public. Health,Housing Reforms now that ObamaCare is ObamaTaxes. (2) Expose Judicial Malpractice acting in concort with any/alL Lawyers,ABOLISH SCAP (3) Separation Powers must be enforced with Criminal RICO

What services should state government provide and how should those services be funded?
Less Government is best Judicial Accountability Estopp Outsourcing our Medical Records to France Questions if Federal Medicaid does not provide for the Doctors, case load may lead to poor care. Please view Forensic Evidence of City St.Paul Ponzi Schemes to Steal,Condemn Single Family Homes. DSI is taking our propertys on the Ingress_Egress of Windows. What Public Health or Improvement?

How can Minnesota improve its business climate and create more jobs?
Techinally with ObamaCareTaxes We're in the Tank. Due Process is denied to the Public Outsourcing Medical Records to France, PC Tech Support ie: Comcast Cable to Phillipines, Dell of Texas TechSupport Phillipines and MN Supreme Court outsourcing to Tyler Tech of Texas. Minnesota is a Sanctuary State, Employ our own instead of outsourcing. Sharon is exposing the 3 Million Settlement re:MGSF Trust Account Federal Judge Ericksen DIRTYCOPS

How would you work to protect Minnesota’s natural resources?
I have a Rain Garden its a simnple start, To conserve Water the St.Paul Corrupt Ponzi Schemes shut my Water Off. Wilful Court neglience to Steal Propertys ie: Aitkin Co. makes deals with Gravel Pit, Overbuilding on Buck Lake etc. Flushing Toilets are not Natures way of eliminating Wastes St.Paul Central Corridor in time will prove to be a Natural Disater, Look at Duluth Floods.

What is the state’s role in funding education?
Let the State controll Schools take Tax Burden from Homeowners. Disparate Impact Seniors vs. Children. Local Government, Townships,municipalitys are out of control. Spend,Spend,Spend Tax,Tax,Tax Let the Lawyers stand in Food Lines. Schools do not teach the Constitution,Court Access via Electronic Commerce, which must change. Even Lawyers and Judges are NOT LEARNED IN E-COMMERCE. In re Scarrella4Justice221NW2d Sharon denied the Employment contrary MNConstArtIII www.sharon4judge.blogspot.

The LWV MInnesota reserves the right to review all responses and edit for clarity and content. We will contact you if changes need to be made.

The online voter guide will be published on Monday, July 23, 2012.  Responses will be available to the public on that date.

Thank you for sending your reply. If you have questions, contact Allison Wagstrom at


Allison Wagstrom
Associate Director
LWV Minnesota
This message was sent to from Voter Guide Toolkit on behalf of 2012 LWV Minnesota Voter Guide. If you would not like to receive any further messages from Voter Guide Toolkit, click here.
To ensure that you receive important messages from Voter Guide Toolkit, please add to your address book.