SharonsFaceBook

Saturday, November 3, 2012

VoteSharon4Seniors_MN4Mitt4Marriage_Love of Country YES

                                        NEWS RELEASE 3RDNOV.2012
                               http://www.mncourts.gov/opinions/sc/current/OPA120622-1031.pdf
On the Graves of our Heritage Minnesota HomeGrownGal Pleads VOTE6THNOV12.
Sent: 11/3/2012 11:16:58 A.M. Central Daylight Time
Subj: CandidateSharon4SeniorsMN64_Constitutionality204c.31County_State Canvass Boards                   Sharon is not a Liar or Lawyer Unreasonable 20 yrs later Tobacco Case Still in Court  THEREFORE DFL Lawyer,Commitment Lawyer Senator64 Dick Cohen MN CONST.ARTIII MUST GO:

TThe Supreme Court concluded (1) the proposed tobacco appropriation bonds did not constitute public debt for which the state's full faith, credit, and taxing powers have been pledged under the plain language of Minn. Const. art. XI, 4; and (2) therefore, the restrictions imposed by Minn. Const. art. XI, 5 do not apply to the bondsSearch Results

  1. MPR: Minnesota's Tobacco Trial: A Summary

    news.minnesota.publicradio.org/features/.../08_stawickie_histo...Cached - SimilarShare
    Shared on Google+. View the post.
    May 8, 1998 – At its heart, Minnesota's tobacco case was a fraud and anti-trust case. The state and Blue Cross and Blue Shield claimed tobacco companies Schowalter v. State
Docket: A12-622
Judge: Per Curiam
Areas of Law: Constitutional Law
Petitioner, the Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Management and Budget, validation tobacco appropriation bonds to be issued to refund, in advance of maturity, outstanding tobacco securit
Opinion Date: October 31, 20
http://j.st/X92 http://law.justia.com/cases/minnesota/supreme-court/2012/a12-622.html
View Case on: Justia  Google Scholar
12
 
SAT: 3NOV2012
Please Vote Tues 6thNov2012 Forward,circulate,copy Vote YES Sharon4Seniors
Minnesota4Mitt4Marriage
 
   Subject: Candidate SharonAndersonABOLISH SCAPCommittment PanelJudgesBadBehaviorRICO Wilful neglience to AbateSeeking Assistance  also www.lawlessamerica.com NOTICE OF GOOD FAITH INTENT TO CHALLENGE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF COUNTY AND STATE CANVASS BOARD MEMBERS, DEFENDANTS MARK OSWALD, SHARI MOORE CITY CLERK,JUDGE KAREN J. ASPHAUG MEMBER OF SCAP ET AL. MN CONSTITUTION ART. III SEPARATION OF POWERS. Ruling Case Law In re: Scarrella4Justice221NW2d562  www.sharon4judge.blogspot.com  www.lufsky.blogspot.com 
 
ThereforeSharon4AG2014
1.    Ramsey   County canvassing board:            Rafael Ortega, Ramsey County Commissioner
                                                                                Jan Parker, Ramsey County Commissioner
                                                                                Mark Oswald, Ramsey County Auditor
                                                                                Lawrence Dease, Ramsey County Court Administrator
                                                                 Shari Moore, St Paul City Clerk – designee of Mayor Coleman
ST. PAUL, Minn.—October 30, 2012—Secretary of State Mark Ritchie today announced the members of the State Canvassing Board whose responsibility it will be to canvass and certify the results of the State General Election held on November 6.

Minnesota Statutes 204C.31 requires the Secretary of State to select the five members of state canvassing board. By law members of the board must be the secretary of state, two judges from the Minnesota Supreme Court and two judges of the district court.

Members of the 2012 State General Election State Canvassing Board include:
• The Honorable Mark Ritchie, Minnesota Secretary of State
• The Honorable Paul H. Anderson, Associate Justice of the Minnesota Supreme Court
• The Honorable Christopher J. Dietzen, Associate Justice of the Minnesota Supreme Court
• The Honorable Edward I. Lynch,  Chief Judge, First Judicial District
• The Honorable Karen J. Asphaug, District Court Judge, First Judicial District

To avoid conflicts of interest, by law, no judges or justices who are members of the state canvassing board may be candidates at the election.  It is also important to note that unlike other election issues subject to administrative recounts, constitutional amendments are not subject to recounts administered by the state canvassing board, but are subject to court election contests.

The State Canvassing Board will meet at 1 p.m. on Tuesday, November 27, 2012, in Room 10 of the State Office Building located at 100 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd., St. Paul, Minnesota
business-handshake-hands-andresr04152-200w
 We are asking all elected and appointed government officials and all political candidates to sign an HONESTY Contract with the Citizens of the United States of America. 
We ask all Americans to vote only for candidates who have signed the Contract.
The Supreme Court Justices: