SharonsFaceBook

Wednesday, October 31, 2012

Sharon4Seniors_Voted_Electronically


 AFFIDAVIT OF CANDIDATE_VOTER SHARON4SENIORS  SENAT 64 www.sharonsenate64.blogspot.com  Affiant Voted today via pdf format
 RomneyRyan_SharonAnderson et al On the Graves of our Heritage FIGHT ON.  This Election is bigger than Watergate.  Sharons Promise to Fight CitySt.Paul,MN re:
Sharon – here is the information you asked forfrom Joe Manskey
1.            County canvassing board:            Rafael Ortega, Ramsey County Commissioner
                                                                                Jan Parker, Ramsey County Commissioner
                                                                                Mark Oswald, Ramsey County Auditor
                                                                                Lawrence Dease, Ramsey County Court Administrator
                                                                                Shari Moore, St Paul City Clerk – designee of Mayor Coleman

2.            Our voting system is the Accuvote-OS optical scan voting system, using the GEMS software. Both are sold by Election Systems and Software.

3.            The filing fee for St Paul mayor is $500. Alternately, a candidate can submit a petition containing the signatures of 500 eligible St Paul voters.


https://sendnow.acrobat.com/?i=TGNG3xJCxAP*dYQ5ZmPbog Download
File sent to you by Sharon Anderson:
SharonsBallot6Nov2012.pdf
2.5 MB
Virus Checked
File will be available for download for 7 days.
To download the file, click on the Download button above or copy and paste this URL into your browser:
https://sendnow.acrobat.com/?i=TGNG3xJCxAP*dYQ5ZmPbog
Note: Adobe SendNow may notify the sender when you download these files.
http://www.angelfire.com/mn3/andersonadvocates/PDFedem2006/file8.pdf
Case 0:04-cv-02632-MJD-SER  Doc.308 Filed 7/27/12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Frank J. Steinhauer, III;
Mark E. Meysembourg; and
Kelly G. Brisson,
Plaintiffs,
v.
Randy Kelly individually and as Mayor of
City of St. Paul; Andy Dawkins individually
and as Director of City of St. Paul’s
Department of Neighborhood Housing and
Property Improvement; Lisa Martin
individually and as a code enforcement
officer of City of St. Paul’s Department of
Neighborhood Housing and Property
Improvement; Steve Magner individually and
as a supervisor of City of St. Paul’s
Department of Neighborhood and Property
Improvement; Dean Koehnen individually
and as law enforcement officer of City of St.
Paul; John Doe and Jane Doe, individually
and in their official capacities as code
enforcement officers of City of St. Paul’s
Department of Neighborhood Housing
Property Improvement, law enforcement
officers or other officials or employees of the
City of St. Paul; individually, jointly and
severally; and City of St. Paul, a municipal
corporation,
Defendants.
Civil File No. 04-02632 (JNE/SRN)
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE
CASE 0:04-cv-02632-MJD-SER Document 308 Filed 07/27/12 Page 1 of 2
2
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned hereby notifies the Court and
counsel that Skip Durocher, Glenn M. Salvo, Sarabeth Ackerman, Meghan Lind, and
Kristin K. Zinsmaster of Dorsey & Whitney LLP, hereby appear as counsel of record for
the Defendants.
Dated: July 27, 2011 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP
By /s/ Skip Durocher
Skip Durocher (#0208966)
durocher.skip@dorsey.com
Glenn M. Salvo (#0349008)salvo.glenn@dorsey.com
Sarabeth Ackerman (#0389608)ackerman.sarabeth@dorsey.com
Meghan Lind (#0389034)lind.meghan@dorsey.com
Kristin K. Zinsmaster (#0391299)zinsmaster.kristin@dorsey.com
Suite 1500, 50 South Sixth Street
Minneapolis, MN 55402-1498
Telephone: (612) 340-2600
Attorneys for Defendants
CASE 0:04-cv-02632-MJD-SER Document 308 Filed 07/27/12 Page 2 of 2
 
 We the People wonder if these lawmakers know that St. Paul also received free legal services from Dorsey & Whitney as part of this dirty dealing? That's right............Dorsey & Whitney put 5 lawyers on the case and told the judge they were representing St Paul for free! Can you believe it?
http://www.twincities.com/stpaul/ci_21884281/st-paul-congressional-gopers-seek-more-data-connected
 
 
The inquiry surrounds the lawsuit Magner vs. Gallagher. Filed by 11 St. Paul landlords, it accused the city of going to excessive lengths to condemn their properties -- a "code to the max" strategy they say reduced the number of affordable housing units available to minorities. They claimed the result was a violation of, or had "disparate impact" under, the federal Fair Housing Act. The city appealed a legal decision to the nation's highest court, and many civil rights advocates worried that the city would win and that the result could create exceptions to the Fair Housing Act and other civil rights legislation. Instead, the case is now being heard in U.S. District Court in St. Paul. An hearing scheduled for Friday, Oct. 26, recently was
http://citystpaul-ponzi-principal.blogspot.com/2012/01/ussc10-1032-citystpaulmagnervslandlords.html

Magner v. Gallagher

Docket No.Op. BelowArgumentOpinionVoteAuthorTerm
10-10328th Cir.Feb 29, 2012TBD TBDTBDOT 2011
Disclaimer: Goldstein & Russell, P.C. serves as counsel to the respondents in this case.
Issue: (1) Whether disparate impact claims are cognizable under the Fair Housing Act; and, if so (2) what test should be used to analyze them.
Plain English Issue: (1) Whether a lawsuit can be brought for a violation of the Fair Housing Act based on a practice that is not discriminatory on its own, but has a discriminatory effect; and, if so, (2) how should courts determine whether a practice has a discriminatory effect and violates the Act?

SCOTUSblog Coverage

Briefs and Documents

Merits Briefs for the Petitioners Amicus Briefs in Support of the Petitioners Amicus Briefs in Support of Neither Party Merits Briefs for the Respondents

Certiorari-stage documents

  • Magner v. Gallagher : SCOTUSblog

    www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/magner-v-gallagher/Cached
    Feb 14, 2012 – Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C. serves as counsel to the respondents in this case. Issue: (1) Whether disparate impact claims are ...






  •